Verbal Agreement Deutsch
There is also a consensus between pronouns and precursors. Examples of this can be found in English (although English pronouns mainly follow natural sex and not grammatical sex): at the beginning of modern times, there was an agreement for the second person, which singles out all verbs in the current form, as well as in the past some usual verbs. It was usually in the shape-east, but -st and t also occurred. Note that this does not affect endings for other people and numbers. Spoken French always distinguishes the plural from the second person and the plural from the first person in the formal language and from the rest of the contemporary form in all the verbs of the first conjugation (infinitive in -il) except Tout. The plural first-person form and the pronoun (us) are now replaced by the pronoun (literally: “one”) and a third person of singular verb in modern French. So we work (formally) on Work. In most of the verbs of other conjugations, each person in the plural can be distinguished between them and singular forms, again, if one uses the traditional plural of the first person. The other endings that appear in written French (i.e. all singular endings and also the third plural person of the Other as the Infinitifs in-er) are often pronounced in the same way, except in the contexts of liaison. Irregular verbs such as being, fair, all and holdings have more pronounced contractual forms than normal verbs. Such a concordance is also found with predictors: man is tall (“man is great”) vs. the chair is large (“the chair is large”).
(In some languages, such as German. B, that is not the case; only the attribute modifiers show the agreement.) A rare type of arrangement that phonologically copies parts of the head instead of agreeing with a grammatical category.  For example, in Bainouk, case agreement is not an essential feature of English (only staff pronouns and case-marking pronouns). A match between these pronouns can sometimes be observed: in the case of verbs, the match between the sexes is less frequent, although it may still occur. In the French past, for example, the former work of the participants corresponds, in certain circumstances, to the subject or an object (for more details, see compound past). In Russian and most other Slavic languages, the form of the past in sex corresponds to the subject. The very irregular verb is the only verb with more coherence than this one in the contemporary form. Also keep in mind the agreement that has been shown to be also in the subjunctive mind.
In English, the defective verbs usually show no agreement for the person or the number, they contain the modal verbs: can, can, can, must, should, should.